Wide Awake Ministries - Wake up America!
2 0 1 0
Candidate Survey & Voter Guide


State & Local JUDICIAL Races

Voters! Don't be mislead by a Judge who may say they are a "Constructionist". It does not necessarily mean that when they make a decision that goes all the way back to the "Founding Fathers" and Original Judiciary Laws but most of the time, they mean only until the last great "Liberal Law" ( even if it goes against the Federal Constitution). They did not go back far enough, so beware and ask them would they overturn a past National, State, or Local Law when it goes against the Federal Constitution? They are not supposed to make a State or Local law that goes against the Federal Constitution, as it is illegal, and impeachable. Those National, State and / or Local laws that go against the Federal Constitution, should be overturned by these Judges.

Editor's Note:
DUTIES OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OR JUDGES
It was the current Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas when coming into office who announced that the duty of the Justice System (or Judges) is to Interpret law cases in the framework of the Constitution only. Today, some judges make up their own laws or other laws, like the International laws, legislating from the bench by using laws outside the Constitution (the State of Texas Constitution should line up with the U. S. Constitution). When Judges take their oath to do their duties, it should be TO INTERPRET THE CURRENT CASES OR PRE-EXISTING CASES TO ALL THAT LINE UP WITH THE STATE (IMPLIED) AND U.S. CONSTITUTION. THERE HAS BEEN NO PUNISHMENT OR IMPEACHMENT FOR THESE JUDGES WHO HAVE GONE AGAINST THEIR DUTIES FOR THE LAST 60 YEARS ALL OVER AMERICA ON ALL LEVELS. THAT IS WHY WE HAVE RUNAWAY COURT SYSTEMS. IF JUDGES DO NOT FOLLOW THE LAWS, WHY SHOULD THE PEOPLE? THERE ARE SOME REALLY GOOD JUDGES. YOU DECIDE WHO IS AND WHO ISN'T.

It is the Legislature who creates the laws that are in the framework of the Constitution but it is the Judges who INTERPRET the law to the Constitution of cases that come before them.

The First Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay said "A Legislative Act contrary to the Constitution is not law". I believe the same is true for each INTERPRETED LAW by the Judiciary System that is not Interpreted to the Constitution and we need to do what is necessary to correct any INCORRECT laws and judges as well. All three Branches are supposed to be subservient to "WE THE PEOPLE"

Answer Key
SF=Strongly Favor F=Favor U=Undecided O=Oppose SO=Strongly Oppose
Democrat Republican
Independent Libertarian
Questions
     Jump to: Responses
1 Do you believe in allowing "Legislating from the Bench" or "Making up your own rules" along with interpreting from the Constitution?
2 Are you a "Constructionist" Judge who believes that in making a "Ruling" according to LAST Judicial Law on the State (&/or) National books, even if it is against the Constitution?
3 Do you believe in following the Constitution which says the Judge should be impeached that do not interpret ONLY to the Constitution According to their oath?

Answer Key
SF=Strongly Favor F=Favor U=Undecided O=Oppose SO=Strongly Oppose
Democrat Republican
Independent Libertarian

State Races
CANDIDATE RESPONSES
Office Sought Candidate Name Q1 Q2 Q3 Comments / Memberships Donated To
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 3
Rick Strange          
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 3
Jim Moseley          
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 3
Debra Lehrmann SO SO SF Read more. Or download Summary of Curriculum Vitae  
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 3
Rick Green SO

SO

F

#2) I am a strict constructionist who believes in applying the actual words of the Constitution or statute and sticking with the original intent of the framers.

#3) I support impeachment as used by the Founding Fathers

 
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 3
Jeff Brown          
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 3
Rebecca Simmons          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 9
Rose Vela          
Justice, Supreme Court,
Place 9
Eva Guzman          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To

Bexar County
CANDIDATE RESPONSES
Office Sought Candidate Name Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
227th District Court Judge Hon. Philip A. Kazen Jr.          
227th District Court Judge Paul Vasquez          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
285th District Court Judge Rosie Alvarado          
285th District Court Judge Milton Fagin          
285th District Court Judge Lawrence Morales          
285th District Court Judge Paul Talamantez          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
Office Sought Candidate Name Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
290th District Court Judge Stephanie Boyd          
290th District Court Judge Norma Gonzales          
290th District Court Judge Sylvia Maria "Rosie" Gonzales          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
Office Sought Candidate Name Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
County Court 5 Judge Hon. Linda Penn          
County Court 5 Judge Ina Castillo          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
County Court 7 Judge Hon. Monica E. Guerrero          
County Court 7 Judge Deborah Sandheinrich          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
County Court 8 Judge Hon. Karen Crouch          
County Court 8 Judge Liza Rodriquez          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
County Court 12 Judge Hon. Michael Mery          
County Court 12 Judge Richard Garcia          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
Office Sought Candidate Name Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
Bexar County Judge Hon. Nelson W. Wolff          
Bexar County Judge Gerardo "Gerard" Ponce          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
Office Sought Candidate Name Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To
Bexar County Dem Party Chair Choco G. Meza          
Bexar County Dem Party Chair Dan Ramos          
     Jump to: Questions
Q1 Q2 Q3 Memberships Donated To

Answer Key
SF=Strongly Favor F=Favor U=Undecided O=Oppose SO=Strongly Oppose
Democrat Republican
Independent Libertarian



Back to top